From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7028 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2012 01:29:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 7020 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Feb 2012 01:29:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-iy0-f171.google.com) (209.85.210.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:29:39 +0000 Received: by iaeh11 with SMTP id h11so10207012iae.2 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:29:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of yselkowitz@gmail.com designates 10.50.203.66 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.203.66; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of yselkowitz@gmail.com designates 10.50.203.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=yselkowitz@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=yselkowitz@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.50.203.66]) by 10.50.203.66 with SMTP id ko2mr16382654igc.7.1329787779408 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:29:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.203.66 with SMTP id ko2mr13240927igc.7.1329787779371; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:29:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (S0106000cf16f58b1.wp.shawcable.net. [24.79.200.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f8sm30456808ibl.6.2012.02.20.17.29.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:29:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1329787780.8088.2.camel@YAAKOV04> Subject: Re: STC for libapr1 failure From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" To: cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:29:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120220141749.GA27701@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <20120215153851.GQ25918@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F3C09D9.6000406@acm.org> <20120215204521.GB27454@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F3C208B.2060007@acm.org> <20120215212010.GA4183@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F3C2E35.3080308@acm.org> <20120216140932.GI19092@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F3D2748.8080205@acm.org> <20120216160458.GK19092@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F401D73.7010908@acm.org> <20120220141749.GA27701@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00601.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 15:17 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > As always, thanks for the testcase. I think I found the problem. It's > hard to explain if you don;t know how the code works, but it boils down > to the fact that my last round of patches back in August were not > actually fixing the problem, but only working around it. I'm hopeful > that I got it right this time. I'm just generating a new snapshot. > Please give it another hit with the APR testsuite. I'm sorry to report that the 20120220 snapshot breaks the X server, which uses fcntl() with a lock file. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple