gcc 2.95.3-5 inline patch

gcc 2.95.3-5 inline patch

[Jason Tishler]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 711 bytes --]

Chris,

The attached patch eliminates warnings such as the following:

In file included from /usr/include/g++-3/set:31,
                 from ../main.cc:145:
/usr/include/g++-3/stl_tree.h: In function `int __black_count(_Rb_tree_node_base *, _Rb_tree_node_base *)':
/usr/include/g++-3/stl_tree.h:1258: warning: can't inline call to `int __black_count(_Rb_tree_node_base *, _Rb_tree_node_base *)'
/usr/include/g++-3/stl_tree.h:1266: warning: called from here

See the following for further motivation:

    http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-05/msg00126.html
    http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-05/msg00127.html

Would you be willing to accept this patch into the Cygwin gcc source tree?

Thanks,
Jason

[-- Attachment #2: stl_tree.h.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 331 bytes --]

--- stl_tree.h.orig	Mon May  6 10:38:33 2002
+++ stl_tree.h	Mon May  6 10:38:52 2002
@@ -1253,7 +1253,7 @@ _Rb_tree<_Key, _Value, _KoV, _Compare, _
                                              upper_bound(__k));
 }
 
-inline int 
+int 
 __black_count(_Rb_tree_node_base* __node, _Rb_tree_node_base* __root)
 {
   if (__node == 0)

[-- Attachment #3: stl_tree.h.ChangeLog --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 144 bytes --]

Mon May  6 13:18:11 2002  Jason Tishler <jason@tishler.net>

	* stl/stl_tree.h (__black_count): Remove inline to eliminate compiler
	warnings.


[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 214 bytes --]

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: gcc 2.95.3-5 inline patch [FAQ alert]

[Christopher Faylor]

On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 01:25:58PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>Chris,
>Would you be willing to accept this patch into the Cygwin gcc source tree?

I'm not going to be issuing any new gcc releases until sometime after
3.1.

I guess this needs to be a FAQ or something.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Gcc-3.1 and binutils under cygwin [Was: gcc 2.95.3-5 inline patch [FAQ alert]]

[Christian Jönsson]

Hello Chris.

Gcc-3.1 is coming out pretty well under cygwin. I'd hope for a gcc-3.1.x
cygwin package also. Even gcj/libjava/libgcj is coming out well, perhaps
in a 3.1.x release but at least pretty good on the trunk.

I'd also like to see a newer binutils on cygin once a gcc-3.1 cygwin
package is being worked on.

Cheers,

/ChJ

-----Original Message-----
From: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-owner@cygwin.com] On Behalf
Of Christopher Faylor
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 7:45 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.3-5 inline patch [FAQ alert]


On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 01:25:58PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>Chris,
>Would you be willing to accept this patch into the Cygwin gcc source 
>tree?

I'm not going to be issuing any new gcc releases until sometime after
3.1.

I guess this needs to be a FAQ or something.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: gcc 2.95.3-5 inline patch [FAQ alert]

[David Starks-Browning]

On Monday 6 May 02, Christopher Faylor writes:
> I'm not going to be issuing any new gcc releases until sometime after
> 3.1.
> 
> I guess this needs to be a FAQ or something.

OK.

David
(Cygwin FAQ maintainer)


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/