From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 122993 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2015 22:03:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 122984 invoked by uid 89); 23 Mar 2015 22:03:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 22:03:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t2NM3j1v002360 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:03:45 -0400 Received: from YAAKOV04.redhat.com ([10.10.116.17]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t2NM3hXf029006 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:03:45 -0400 Message-ID: <1427148223.912.37.camel@cygwin.com> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: util-linux-2.25.2-2 From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 22:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <874mpbiexc.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <874mpbiexc.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00403.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 22:26 +0100, Achim Gratz wrote: > Yaakov Selkowitz writes: > > This update adds /sbin/nologin and moves most of the /usr/sbin > > executables to /sbin where they are generally expected to be found. > > So Cygwin will grow another mount /sbin -> /usr/sbin to keep things > consistent? Last time I've asked Corinna said she doesn't intend to do > that. Probably not, the reason being it is would be quite difficult to implement a new mount without breaking existing setups. -- Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple