From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 84469 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2017 14:42:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 84426 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jul 2017 14:42:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,GIT_PATCH_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=monte, H*x:1.1.10155, carlo, H*UA:1.1.10155 X-HELO: sonic314-47.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: from sonic314-47.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (HELO sonic314-47.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (66.163.189.173) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:42:45 +0000 Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic314.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:42:07 +0000 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:12:00 -0000 From: "Ian Lambert via cygwin" Reply-To: Ian Lambert Reply-To: Ian Lambert To: Ian Lambert , , Ken Brown Message-ID: <1438727230.474852.1500993486132@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: how to access and display apps that I've launched MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <1438727230.474852.1500993486132.ref@mail.yahoo.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg00356.txt.bz2 -------------------------------------------- On Tue, 7/25/17, Ken Brown <> wrote: Subject: Re: how to access and display apps that I've launched To: "Ian Lambert" <>, cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Tuesday, July 25, 2017, 9:03 AM =20 On 7/25/2017 12:26 AM, Ian Lambert wrote: > On July 24, 2017 10:58:29 PM EDT, Ken Brown <> wrote: >> On 7/24/2017 6:08 PM, Ian Lambert via cygwin wrote: >>> This time I ran "rebase-trigger full", did full shutdown/restart, >> then ran setup. >> >>>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 [main] nautilus 3240 child_info_fork::abort: >> E:\cygwin64-3\bin\cygpangocairo-1.0-0.dll: Loaded to different address: >> parent(0x3F0000) !=3D child(0x2F0000) >=20 >> This kind of fork error can be very stubborn.=C2=A0 The best long-term >> solution is to switch to 64-bit Cygwin if you can.=C2=A0 If you absolutely >> have to stick to 32-bit, try to limit the number of DLLs that are >> installed. >=20 >=20 > I'm using 64 bit cygwin already. This is a difference from the OP (It was in my earlier post). =20 Sorry, I missed that.=C2=A0 Have you looked at the output of 'rebase -is'?=20 Conflicts are marked with '*'.=C2=A0 What about BLODA? =20 =3D =3D =3D=20 I had not. It may be worth mentioning I have not found rebase=20 in the fine manual, even under cygwin utilities. I only find it mentioned in forum posts, and with 4 rebase* programs under /usr/bin, it's playing too much monte carlo games with=20 the install to just try those. Obviously something is not right; here is output from "rebase -is": rebase: failed to open rebase database "/etc/rebase.db.x86_64": No such file or directory =20 "locate rebase.db" gives: /cygdrive/e/cygwin64-3/etc/rebase.db.x86_64 so it was apparently there when running locate database updates yesterday at ~1130-1330 (Eastern US), before doing the=20 "rebase-trigger full", shutdown/restart, setup. BLODA is certainly a possibility; Symantec Protection is on the job... It was playing well together before, but things do change. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple