From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 111672 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2015 22:08:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 111663 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2015 22:08:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 22:08:53 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58D49C0AE666 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 22:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from YAAKOV04.redhat.com (ovpn-116-31.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.31]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t8IM8oKE015499 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:08:51 -0400 Message-ID: <1442614138.5072.8.camel@cygwin.com> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New: luajit-2.0.4-1 From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 22:08:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <55FC62DD.2060602@cornell.edu> References: <55FC62DD.2060602@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00276.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 15:15 -0400, Ken Brown wrote: > Thanks for this! I can use your 64-bit patch to build luajittex on > 64-bit Cygwin. Two questions: > > 1. Do you plan to send your patch upstream? I had some correspondence > with the author last year in which he said he would welcome a patch to > make luajit build on 64-bit Cygwin. Unfortunately, upstreaming takes time (particularly when dealing with the many misconceptions people have about Cygwin) so I've admittedly been lax in that regard. > 2. Why did you use the -fexceptions flag in your build? The build > succeeds without that flag, and luajit still works AFAICT. (But I don't > really know how to test it.) I'm just taking their word for it: http://repo.or.cz/w/luajit-2.0.git/blob/8715ae6:/src/lj_err.c#l20 In particular, see line 50-55, although perhaps that only applies to ELF? -- Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple