From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 87010 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2015 21:02:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 86991 invoked by uid 89); 20 Oct 2015 21:02:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:02:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDA77C0AF7AD for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from YAAKOV04.redhat.com (ovpn-116-20.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.20]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t9KL2V02027162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:02:32 -0400 Message-ID: <1445374958.12108.56.camel@cygwin.com> Subject: Re: Terminfo bug in screen-256color From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:02:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87si55nz07.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <1445361572.12108.40.camel@cygwin.com> <87wpuhnzgo.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87si55nz07.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00324.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 21:03 +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: > Achim Gratz writes: > >> Can you confirm that this patch contains the necessary changes: > >> > >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ncurses.git/tree/ncurses-kbs.patch > > > > The solution I used was different IIRC, but I'll have to dig out the > > details. > > I don't know much about these things, but it seems that the patch you're > linking to deals with the interpretation of the backspace key in certain > situations? You are correct, that patch is unrelated. However, it turns out that ncurses-6.0 ships with new 'tmux' and 'tmux-256color' terminfos, which appear to include the settings indicated in said FAQ. tmux should use these instead of the screen terminfos. I'm in the process of triple-checking that I have the correct options to avoid ABI breakage in ncurses-6.0, at which point I'll upload and you can use these instead. -- Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple