From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from forward501b.mail.yandex.net (forward501b.mail.yandex.net [178.154.239.145]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58ED6385829F for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 02:05:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 58ED6385829F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=yandex.ru Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=yandex.ru ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 58ED6385829F Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=178.154.239.145 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701396306; cv=none; b=rokeffwKipRyRDiH5/U6etpv4unn+tIY8tsweCsWPppX3YX92X/BJhtQCxNALo0CKz5Nzve1nSzxoc4cphd1mJNhaKhGx4Cxg0f8rQ1X2uANRmw8c36jBv7+owD81plgXnqlHriNBB3TiQ/wqk39WZ+DlwJ9qNwpGCauPVS0MS4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701396306; c=relaxed/simple; bh=A40Mq2FCi3xMRMbe5kRhNn/bbutQBOjPdEYJgMx+Pbs=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:Message-ID:To:Subject:MIME-Version; b=OlhcGMG6BrWp4aSe1Ar93+nh7GAC36+kbWXCsqI0A0FTQWVEU4lpHeC4lgYM7cKVKHwSI4C5NY4PL1ECB+i7xclbN1VepIpk5jpV7uSL1eR2syPwwC59xQzKNRWv3HsdSwXAHO8z4q6fJvyHCewlcY7sNG76Nh8N4SelZgQ18lw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-90.myt.yp-c.yandex.net (mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-90.myt.yp-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c12:4781:0:640:cfd5:0]) by forward501b.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 3E85C61367; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 05:05:01 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-90.myt.yp-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 05MGrg7oH0U0-FIHOG0uw; Fri, 01 Dec 2023 05:05:00 +0300 X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1701396300; bh=gRKQnr7OmfATBgzmYjfoaMFnCe4q5LOsRdwaBNe6sSo=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:References:To:Message-ID:Reply-To:From; b=TNfOTD0FYJQi/wbbaqvGOejBZZ2Za9UXmuhqwe+bXoXxD4VJuLca0dwduJZHcTykT ueysOks383zfTKK2gQd/7r+VPVS+8WMkVGqipdePcnWLE0eXeP5e1bPuFTiVQ/i+Ij GmaUxo+X2jA9Xia9cPiwNzV4lBmTS4POEXg14loE= Authentication-Results: mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-90.myt.yp-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Received: from [192.168.1.10] (HELO daemon2.darkdragon.lan) by daemon2 (Office Mail Server 0.8.12 build 08053101) with SMTP; Fri, 01 Dec 2023 01:55:28 -0000 Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 04:55:28 +0300 From: Andrey Repin X-Mailer: The Bat! (v9.3.4) Professional Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <1463776016.20231201045528@yandex.ru> To: Martin Wege , cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cygwin mount limited to 64 mounts, even for UNC paths? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Greetings, Martin Wege! > Cygwin mount(1) is (per docs) limited to 64 mounts. Why was that > limitation chosen, and does it apply even if I create bind mounts to > UNC paths (not DOS letters)? DOS letters might be restricted by the > ASCII A-Z, but UNC paths are unlimited. More interesting question is: why do you need so many _Cygwin_ mounts? There's a lot of other options, from NTFS junctions to using UNC paths directly (Cygwin tools aren't picky in this regard). -- With best regards, Andrey Repin Friday, December 1, 2023 04:53:35 Sorry for my terrible english...