From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32160 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2013 09:35:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 32130 invoked by uid 89); 17 Dec 2013 09:35:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtpback.ht-systems.ru Received: from smtpback.ht-systems.ru (HELO smtpback.ht-systems.ru) (78.110.50.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:35:08 +0000 Received: from [91.78.166.180] (helo=darkdragon.lan) by smtp.ht-systems.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Vsr3O-0000Nf-4H; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:35:02 +0400 Received: from [192.168.1.10] (HELO daemon2.darkdragon.lan) by daemon2 (Office Mail Server 0.8.12 build 08053101) with SMTP; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:32:36 -0000 Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:35:00 -0000 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <1478338508.20131217133235@mtu-net.ru> To: Gerry Reno , cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cannot execute binary file In-Reply-To: <52AFBDAE.5040808@verizon.net> References: <52AF84E3.7070109@verizon.net> <52AF9A80.5010605@gmail.com> <52AF9B87.2030906@verizon.net> <52AFB969.6040501@cygwin.com> <52AFBDAE.5040808@verizon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00295.txt.bz2 Greetings, Gerry Reno! > I just got finished installing Cygwin on another machine and this time the -c does work. So I went back and looked at > the original machine. There are 2 cygwin installations on that machine in different directories. I had forgotten that > Cygwin got installed a while back on this machine to support some app that needed it. So somehow having 2 different > installations breaks this mintty -e capability. Does this qualify as a bug? Is Cygwin supporting 2 independent > installations? It do support two _independent_ installations. This means, each of them have no way to find out about existence of the other, barring the full disk search. Yours were not that independent. Likely, them both were listed in $PATH. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon@yandex.ru) 17.12.2013, <13:31> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple