From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AD69385782A for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:15:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 7AD69385782A Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id w1so33420001ejf.11 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 05:15:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rINGpHHVVezRM9VjsB8Kh/Les9VOYZYeJjxBwEpv6FU=; b=ZChQAf2ghbD9bBggDiHXDLlQJZ2AkNE7BnF4l8SQ89VLmMUhhOHytQmKkU53pWDZBw z4hh172PtXpHX5/UlVnVP0szjmNkRookZAOoKMYVEdeNWx7GswHp9kL//0sNPM9If6lL g8Bx+CJ4Dog7zjCRNpflW7uVyQAxk/lKP1zrHzE8GVeEzD7bXmtgjQMpIrSzM0Clz3+J 8FjfWMHD5LEFmHXBcl1NGcERJsLjb+Nd/BcqfihhMHIg2AyLny7Mpr1JPWuADCt3bdBo FSRnBPTFx1x2YSwbpvASOvIo7byF8pjRQDSOMLFbGLah6OeCp7ePN5RpaFaP2/mbIUk2 1TMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532KVfxOE1+HzTcCPanlbrvZq9bNJA7Xk3dmqUd2JnUvYhhc4hDZ hewcqE9uEhaFZBrTDviYxvQEBHBj3iGS7A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxntzzN1nsLPlxvUqZCxq0ScBi+cmNLt+vgrgg28IfDU0n6nT0JH89Yzocqw3iOoMXQlbI8Kg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1d5a:: with SMTP id o26mr6184009ejh.301.1611148521593; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 05:15:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2003:cc:9f0c:c8de:803b:dee0:842f:7516? (p200300cc9f0cc8de803bdee0842f7516.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cc:9f0c:c8de:803b:dee0:842f:7516]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b101sm1101995edf.49.2021.01.20.05.15.20 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 05:15:20 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Python packaging policy? To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <647a2c86-fe44-c044-7d8a-5b47b959f198@gmail.com> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <1480177c-b54c-e7de-a42b-91661eecb62a@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 14:15:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: it Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:15:23 -0000 On 20.01.2021 11:26, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin wrote: > On 20/01/2021 05:02, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote: >> On 20.01.2021 00:02, Oleksandr Gavenko via Cygwin wrote: >> >> About the "pip install" please use 3.8 as your base >> and use "python3.8 -m pip .." to avoid misalignment >> between python and pip >> > > Is python3-* still okay for source package names, eg python3-wx that I > maintain? > > Hamish > I see no problem if you are just delivering only one python 3.X interface, that usually is typical of providing a main program with a python interface your python3-wx, mine postgresql-plpython and the recent python3-cv2 all fall in this case. The scheme python 36 / 37 /38 is more for python purely packages Regards Marco