From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22425 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2001 15:24:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22382 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2001 15:24:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO oac40.hsc.uth.tmc.edu) (129.106.30.40) by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2001 15:24:05 -0000 Received: from GIRCH19 ([129.106.218.182]) by oac40.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 oac40 Jun 11 2001 16:23:30) with ESMTP id GMULG401.I4Q for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:24:04 -0600 From: Markus Hoenicka MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15347.57019.798000.33006@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 08:26:00 -0000 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: no more package moratorium? In-Reply-To: References: <007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> <20011114124323.C24614@cygbert.vinschen.de> X-Mailer: VM 6.94 under Emacs 20.6.1 X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00304.txt.bz2 What is wrong with tetex-beta? Could you explain what exactly should be fixed? Please try to provide useful bug reports. "Is broke, please fix" does not count as useful, IMHO. regards, Markus Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > What about existing packages? Specifically, it would be grand if > tetex-beta would either get fixed or removed. -- Markus Hoenicka, PhD UT Houston Medical School Dept. of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology 6431 Fannin MSB4.114 Houston, TX 77030 (713) 500-6313, -7477 (713) 500-7444 (fax) Markus.Hoenicka@uth.tmc.edu http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/hoenicka_markus/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/