From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26124 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2008 11:47:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 26113 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Sep 2008 11:47:32 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (HELO ik-out-1112.google.com) (66.249.90.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:46:51 +0000 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c21so3405010ika.2 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.25.18 with SMTP id 18mr4812456eby.144.1221738407919; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Natsuki ( [83.197.79.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c9sm16507771nfi.26.2008.09.18.04.46.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:46:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:23:00 -0000 From: Paul-Kenji Cahier X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.16.2) Professional Reply-To: Paul-Kenji Cahier Message-ID: <1542859895.20080918134643@F1-Photo.com> To: Jay , cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re[2]: Slow fork issue - Win x64 In-Reply-To: References: <1221716111.21095.ezmlm@cygwin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2008-09/txt/msg00423.txt.bz2 > but maybe merely bringing up AMD64 up to the speed of x86 would suffice. I think that that would be already a great progress... I see no reason why amd64 windows' would be so much slower. Another test on a vista 64 showed speeds around 7-8. If anyone has any idea what to do to speed up up to the 32bit os' speed, I'd be glad to hear about it. Thanks, Paul -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/