From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABECE385BF83 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 00:57:12 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org ABECE385BF83 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=yselkowitz@cygwin.com Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-334-8LUlzJ91MjKXLbYF6UYP7A-1; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 20:57:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 8LUlzJ91MjKXLbYF6UYP7A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AAB6100550D for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 00:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ovpn-117-48.rdu2.redhat.com (ovpn-117-48.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.117.48]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F41775C28E for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 00:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1589e4d3f86e0fb8102ffa419af0d0ccf53d6cca.camel@cygwin.com> Subject: Re: Problem in mingw64-i686-binutils [Was: Updated: binutils-2.34+1git.de9c1b7cfe-1 (x86/x86_64)] From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 20:57:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 (3.34.4-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NEUTRAL, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 00:57:22 -0000 On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 23:55 +0000, JonY via Cygwin wrote: > On 4/6/20 10:07 AM, Jan Nijtmans via Cygwin wrote: > > Ping. > >=20 > > Would it be possible to release a version of mingw64-i686-binutils with= the > > same patch as done for binutils-2.34+1git.de9c1b7cfe-1? I suspect > > this would resolve the problem described here. >=20 > Can you please report this issue to the binutils mailing list? I am > unfamiliar with the binutils internals to know what exactly went wrong. JonY, I think the relevant differences after 2.34 were PR24511 and PR25447, which are already fixed upstream: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=3Dbinutils-gdb.git;a=3Dcommitdiff;h=3D40bfb97= 62747f8336b17c70a0173d10200fa62eb https://sourceware.org/git/?p=3Dbinutils-gdb.git;a=3Dcommitdiff;h=3D82f439d= 028c65663a0baf0a17ef5c4a2ea5c84a7 Adding those as patches to 2.34 should fix the issue without having to resort to a git snapshot. -- Yaakov