From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.219]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B37D3858D1E for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2023 22:10:40 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 6B37D3858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=clisp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=clisp.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1681855835; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=duPqfJu9stMlWmWYFa5OZbZkgZb4Wexlnsju05MGCBvnCNmUH6kcmuVNnOHQWqW3bd 7BrwOQMAUjWIM2CZ+YKGQ3IglD6ohHmQfw1SQGaaJIGAgOKkewE9/Bl9XpaKDiuy8k5V g57PSo7VmBQf3FbtdZ9I9/GZYG5F2w6ejenqRmlnuP2aTohH+oFe1UDxmY1ZM/xYVKZw //aPcDNMCcMGk3Mq4yhMWhfpwXvJX/fmcxToVBAwS18O7E/rkH2TlX4h/e/40fO0rHCX E2bdaRU1Z0scWrUMczqYsjn4yY+OrTeMLLV9ResQRiQO8aiD5XNFxppJBRqAdaGYUdl6 JZsg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1681855835; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Cc:Date:From: Subject:Sender; bh=7XPjtOxjzzH0g2L9fWUbdKQUrEy/wIRPmIHlnM1EvB8=; b=GmjVXY6quxXmlag5dW55dXw8inbNCU7Ig95JCHl6dWe/mgafg9KeRlsMnRREkGp5pg DA+VpKv/ImbyeR1UvNXQxuMlv+Sx6hGfzzRx8AGgQ/bP95NBa1lozVEotxxbsGirxLyM RD7xEYNaxf3B5oyiPa0XcVqdqLusvys+1Y8mUdyIVKPfdHZX5yzYEtI8dQ9/UnOoN340 v/oQmjOV6CWIlisvMA1bcJjruW356rRdIqF5nLzkXqnN3Z8gEf3BHiDLlIVBJZULTHWj rot/h3pbejVlvmOCohdbgsFPgYg3cVp1dDhDpaKXzo86A22XbPZ8FET0DGRGZ+E0c+R0 a9UA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; arc=none; dkim=none X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1681855835; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Cc:Date:From: Subject:Sender; bh=7XPjtOxjzzH0g2L9fWUbdKQUrEy/wIRPmIHlnM1EvB8=; b=jhLAegbpzOabHZxc+8Zw/TgxIAbJ+BBR2Sr72Oe6svu/AAbbSQdM8CLIAhL7KZzPGp CwAxTu4bufirlh+TqZbeja7qAFFDGYGmBrSFPIHxg+GyfQHCAyqUOj5TxFlNYeWzVZ1D Z6aQyufhuS2KH43X/agJ1ur7Wa5JIWbTEUWW2Cqs8h6L1Lai50W9VMhZA40w6jOjJZpG ORycdHBA8YLrMDWD616lvfcxOShBfrwWCRvcPIfwsHCWFe27uJCaeTOIZEekuA4Njt2m P7bD7UtntAh1z5zbdV/pNas0Mtolrsb2T1OvQ2hdrRydnY9es6ieIBCXfZsYQc8mEY7W Qmlg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1681855835; s=strato-dkim-0003; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Cc:Date:From: Subject:Sender; bh=7XPjtOxjzzH0g2L9fWUbdKQUrEy/wIRPmIHlnM1EvB8=; b=veYGHBdP3QgxYrh7ewbZnZ6GrWQeKmqnNV1eO+QBuhU4Md01sdUBZlG0Z9j8EcAEnB pR9asLpIT5nw5ZsXzqCg== X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH0WWb0LN8XZoH94zq68+3cfpOT2vN+j99710EKugYHXkRHprwZvw==" Received: from nimes.localnet by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 49.4.0 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id D064b6z3IMAZXVV (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:10:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Bruno Haible To: cygwin@cygwin.com, Eric Blake Subject: Re: posix_spawn facility Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:10:34 +0200 Message-ID: <1741636.G7SD5HZVK5@nimes> In-Reply-To: References: <1752276.7aRn1RRit1@nimes> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Eric Blake wrote: > we now have implementations in the wild that differ in behavior, and > use security as a reason for the divergence, it is worth getting that > clarified in POSIX. I'll file a bug against POSIX shortly =46or the reference, the systems that return ENOEXEC for posix_spawnp attempting to execute a script without #! marker are: - glibc/Linux =E2=89=A5 2.15 - glibc/Hurd =E2=89=A5 2.33 (commit 13adfa34aff03fd9f1c1612b537a0d736ddb6= c2b) - musl libc Bruno