From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23614 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2015 18:35:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 23603 invoked by uid 89); 13 Sep 2015 18:35:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.ht-systems.ru Received: from smtp.ht-systems.ru (HELO smtp.ht-systems.ru) (78.110.50.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 18:35:09 +0000 Received: from [95.165.144.62] (helo=darkdragon.lan) by smtp.ht-systems.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) (Authenticated sender: postmaster@rootdir.org) id 1ZbC7B-0002pd-De ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 21:35:01 +0300 Received: from [192.168.1.10] (HELO daemon2.darkdragon.lan) by daemon2 (Office Mail Server 0.8.12 build 08053101) with SMTP; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 18:24:05 -0000 Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 18:35:00 -0000 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <1885342528.20150913212405@yandex.ru> To: Mikkel Filla , cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: NOACL leads to a massive speed slowdown in file system processes In-Reply-To: <55F5B412.2040504@arcor.de> References: <1750747142.592411.1442135988978.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail17.arcor-online.net> <55F5B412.2040504@arcor.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00218.txt.bz2 Greetings, Mikkel Filla! > Wow, that seems a very fast solution. Are there any side effects which > could be a problem? Else I wonder, why this is not the default setting. This is not the default exactly because of its nature. It is unusable. You will not be able to run scripts from such mount point. However, I don't quite understand the nature of the issue here. Why not assume all files "executable", and only check the magic word, when we actually trying to execute them? -- With best regards, Andrey Repin Sunday, September 13, 2015 21:21:28 Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple