From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 47627 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2019 21:35:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 47615 invoked by uid 89); 18 Aug 2019 21:35:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:821 X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca Received: from smtp-out-so.shaw.ca (HELO smtp-out-so.shaw.ca) (64.59.136.139) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 21:35:39 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.114] ([24.64.172.44]) by shaw.ca with ESMTP id zSpshkFjeIhW9zSpth0byy; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 15:35:37 -0600 Reply-To: Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca Subject: Re: GCC release criteria To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <98EBD8E1-2785-46BE-B0A4-61D4B881EBC0@Denis-Excoffier.org> From: Brian Inglis Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <1919d800-4ed4-7dce-be5f-df9e0219e365@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 08:40:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <98EBD8E1-2785-46BE-B0A4-61D4B881EBC0@Denis-Excoffier.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00268.txt.bz2 On 2019-08-18 08:51, Denis Excoffier wrote: > In the GCC 10 Release Criteria, one can read > (https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/criteria.html) that cygwin is among the > secondary platform list: >> Secondary Platform List >> >> The secondary platforms are: >> * aarch64-elf >> * i686-apple-darwin >> * i686-pc-cygwin >> * i686-mingw32 >> * powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.0.0 >> * s390x-linux-gnu > This is ok of course, but nowadays, perhaps would it be a better choice > that they switch to x86_64-pc-cygwin? What do you think? Also mingw64-x86_64, and doubt there is an i686-apple-darwin, more likely x86_64-/amd64-apple-darwin. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple