Re: Missing virtual functions

[Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU>]

This is an off-topic answer to an off-topic question about GNU C++.

Eric Britten <ebritten@uci.edu> writes:

>Yesterday I found that if one declares virtual functions in a class
>like:
>
>class A
>{
>    A();
>    virtual void B();
>};
>
>and the definitions for the functions(inline or external) are not found
>by the linker then two types of linking errors result.
>
>1.  Undefined reference to a vtable in the constructors of the class.
>2.  Undefined reference to any other inline functions of the class that
>are used by other code.
>
>It took me a while to figure out that if all virtual functions are
>defined, then these errors go away.  Is this GNU specific?

The exact error messages you get are probably specific to GNU C++.
However, the fact that you do get errors if virtual functions
are not defined is not GNU specific.  The GNU behaviour conforms
to the draft ANSI/ISO C++ standard, which says that programs must
contain a definition of every virtual function.  (Implementations
are not _required_ to diagnose this error, however, so such code
_may_ work on other compilers...)

--
Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au>   |  "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: < http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh >   |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger fjh@128.250.37.3         |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".