From: Steven Bellenot <sfb@entropy.math.fsu.edu>
To: rminnich@sarnoff.com (Ron G. Minnich)
Cc: gnu-win32@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: philosophy question
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 1997 06:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199711051406.JAA15539@entropy.math.fsu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.971105085104.16748E-100000@terra>
>
> On Tue, 4 Nov 1997, Steven Bellenot wrote:
> > I see three directions gnuwin32 could/should go:
> > 1. Providing Unix based tools that are usable in win32. How a person
> > can live without a reasonable shell, diff, grep and friends ...
> > 2. Provide a development environment for the translation of the
> > vast freeware of unix to win32.
> > 3. Make an environment as nearly unix-like as possible.
>
> i don't see a conflict. My goal is simple: to take as much control as
> possible of NT away from microsoft and into the free software community,
> so that on those rare cases when I have to use NT, I don't use their
> miserable tools, their expensive software, or depend on their unreliable
> SDKs. "Embrace and extend". gnu-win32 is a step toward that end. In the
> limit, we boot an NT kernel and run only gnu tools on top. Now that would be
> fun.
>
> ron
>
Whereas I agree with your goal I would say you fit into goal #3.
I would say you would want an environment shell that completely
hides the MicroSoft layer below. You would have no need of tools
that co-exist, or live in a stand alone environment.
From a #3 view point, it might be better to replace MS lame login
with an /etc/passwd based system but that certainly would not fit
a #1 view point
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-11-05 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-11-04 19:55 Steven Bellenot
1997-11-05 5:55 ` Ron G. Minnich
1997-11-05 6:06 ` Steven Bellenot [this message]
1997-11-05 15:11 ` Darren Rauckman
1997-11-05 15:42 ` Geoffrey Noer
1997-11-06 12:25 Georg Klein
1997-11-07 13:44 ` Philip Paul K. Denno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199711051406.JAA15539@entropy.math.fsu.edu \
--to=sfb@entropy.math.fsu.edu \
--cc=gnu-win32@cygnus.com \
--cc=rminnich@sarnoff.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).