public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@cygnus.com>
To: Cygwin Forum <cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: unsubscribe (OFF TOPIC)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 08:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19990211110304.A3574@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: < 36C2FB9D.519A1D88@ece.gatech.edu >; from Charles Wilson on Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 10:47:42AM -0500

I have moved this discussion offline.

I would appreciate it if people would please let this thread die.

cgf

On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 10:47:42AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Although I agree with your sentiment, Chris, I think you picked the wrong target.
>I did not find Simon's post to be a bad-humored rant at all. (Off-topic - well,
>probably so, yes) Truthfully, I thought he expressed a good idea - and rather
>than whining about some problem, he proposed a solution. That's what the
>open-source community is all about, right?
>
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Actually, you have seen very few unsubscribe messages in the last few
>> years because the previous mailing list software was set up to do pretty
>> much what you describe.
>>
>> As should be painfully obvious, we are still in the process of tweaking
>> the new mailing list software.  We didn't get everything exactly right
>> in our first attempt.
>>
>> Also, you're responding to a thread that died out almost a week ago.
>>
>> Personally, I find these little bad-humored, off-topic rants much more
>> distracting than the occasional 'unsubscribe' message.
>>
>> YMMV.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 02:23:38PM -0800, Simon Quellen Field wrote:
>> >How many times over the past few years have we seen 'unsubscribe'
>> >messages?  When that many people can't figure out how to do common
>> >operations with a piece of software, maybe it's time to blame the
>> >software instead of the people.
>> >
>> >How difficult can it be to write a list server that looks at the mail it is
>> >about to send, checking for content that has nothing but the word
>> >'unsubscribe' in it?  Certainly once it has found such a piece of mail,
>> >it is not brain surgery to decide not to mail it out to the list, but
>> >instead to simply honor the request.
>> >
>> >Maybe the problem is that the list server was designed to make
>> >Multi-Level Marketing easy, (hence the name 'ezmlm'), and people
>> >who cater to spammers have a different outlook than a bunch of
>> >programmers who donate their time to providing free software to
>> >the world.
>> >
>> >Maybe the next free software project should be a smarter list server.
>> >
>> >At 03:18 PM 2/4/99 -0500, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
>> >>At 11:59 AM 2/4/99 -0800, H. Sawyer Gillespie wrote:
>> >>>unsubscribe
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>Can people PLEASE stop sending their requests for unsubscribing to the list?
>> >>The proper way to unsubscribe from the list is to send mail to the LIST
>> >>SERVER address, NOT the list address itself.  If you don't know what the
>> >>address is that you should send to, check the Cygnus web site.  It clearly
>> >>states the address and the process.  See:
>> >>
>> >>   http://sourceware.cygnus.com/cygwin/lists.html
>> >>
>> >>For example, people looking to get off the cygwin list should send mail to
>> >>cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com.

--   
Want to unsubscribe from this list?                             
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@cygnus.com>
To: Cygwin Forum <cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: unsubscribe (OFF TOPIC)
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19990211110304.A3574@cygnus.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <19990228230200.MPWWcrB_rvozOhfh4CYCfOdiytY6Icid4q3REhuc4rY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36C2FB9D.519A1D88@ece.gatech.edu>

I have moved this discussion offline.

I would appreciate it if people would please let this thread die.

cgf

On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 10:47:42AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Although I agree with your sentiment, Chris, I think you picked the wrong target.
>I did not find Simon's post to be a bad-humored rant at all. (Off-topic - well,
>probably so, yes) Truthfully, I thought he expressed a good idea - and rather
>than whining about some problem, he proposed a solution. That's what the
>open-source community is all about, right?
>
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Actually, you have seen very few unsubscribe messages in the last few
>> years because the previous mailing list software was set up to do pretty
>> much what you describe.
>>
>> As should be painfully obvious, we are still in the process of tweaking
>> the new mailing list software.  We didn't get everything exactly right
>> in our first attempt.
>>
>> Also, you're responding to a thread that died out almost a week ago.
>>
>> Personally, I find these little bad-humored, off-topic rants much more
>> distracting than the occasional 'unsubscribe' message.
>>
>> YMMV.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 02:23:38PM -0800, Simon Quellen Field wrote:
>> >How many times over the past few years have we seen 'unsubscribe'
>> >messages?  When that many people can't figure out how to do common
>> >operations with a piece of software, maybe it's time to blame the
>> >software instead of the people.
>> >
>> >How difficult can it be to write a list server that looks at the mail it is
>> >about to send, checking for content that has nothing but the word
>> >'unsubscribe' in it?  Certainly once it has found such a piece of mail,
>> >it is not brain surgery to decide not to mail it out to the list, but
>> >instead to simply honor the request.
>> >
>> >Maybe the problem is that the list server was designed to make
>> >Multi-Level Marketing easy, (hence the name 'ezmlm'), and people
>> >who cater to spammers have a different outlook than a bunch of
>> >programmers who donate their time to providing free software to
>> >the world.
>> >
>> >Maybe the next free software project should be a smarter list server.
>> >
>> >At 03:18 PM 2/4/99 -0500, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
>> >>At 11:59 AM 2/4/99 -0800, H. Sawyer Gillespie wrote:
>> >>>unsubscribe
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>Can people PLEASE stop sending their requests for unsubscribing to the list?
>> >>The proper way to unsubscribe from the list is to send mail to the LIST
>> >>SERVER address, NOT the list address itself.  If you don't know what the
>> >>address is that you should send to, check the Cygnus web site.  It clearly
>> >>states the address and the process.  See:
>> >>
>> >>   http://sourceware.cygnus.com/cygwin/lists.html
>> >>
>> >>For example, people looking to get off the cygwin list should send mail to
>> >>cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com.

--   
Want to unsubscribe from this list?                             
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com


  parent reply	other threads:[~1999-02-11  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-02-04  9:04 unsubscribe Simon Quellen Field
     [not found] ` < 199902041658.IAA13731@deimos.nc.com >
1999-02-04  9:48   ` unsubscribe Ke Du
     [not found]     ` < 000001be5066$3b093ce0$7f80a8c0@DEV9503.scicom.com >
1999-02-04 12:00       ` unsubscribe H. Sawyer Gillespie
     [not found]         ` < NCBBLENLPLLFJBDGHJFMCEEBCAAA.hgillesp@u.washington.edu >
1999-02-04 12:23           ` unsubscribe Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
     [not found]             ` < 3.0.3.32.19990204151830.00962460@pop.ma.ultranet.com >
1999-02-04 15:30               ` unsubscribe Christopher Faylor
1999-02-28 23:02                 ` unsubscribe Christopher Faylor
1999-02-10 14:19               ` unsubscribe Simon Quellen Field
     [not found]                 ` < 199902102213.OAA18098@deimos.nc.com >
1999-02-11  6:09                   ` unsubscribe Christopher Faylor
1999-02-11  7:47                     ` unsubscribe Charles Wilson
     [not found]                       ` < 36C2FB9D.519A1D88@ece.gatech.edu >
1999-02-11  8:02                         ` Christopher Faylor [this message]
1999-02-28 23:02                           ` unsubscribe (OFF TOPIC) Christopher Faylor
1999-02-28 23:02                       ` unsubscribe Charles Wilson
1999-02-28 23:02                     ` unsubscribe Christopher Faylor
1999-02-28 23:02                 ` unsubscribe Simon Quellen Field
1999-02-28 23:02             ` unsubscribe Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
1999-02-28 23:02         ` unsubscribe H. Sawyer Gillespie
1999-02-28 23:02     ` unsubscribe Ke Du
1999-02-28 23:02 ` unsubscribe Simon Quellen Field

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19990211110304.A3574@cygnus.com \
    --to=cgf@cygnus.com \
    --cc=cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).