From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Suhaib M. Siddiqi" To: "DJ Delorie" Cc: "cygwin" Subject: Re: Cygwin participation threshold Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <013801be5ea8$3b8e22c0$29acdfd0@InspirePharm.Com> X-SW-Source: 1999-02n/msg00715.html Message-ID: <19990228230200.XWlWtzsBCpgsUlcRLIdQ-irMANB_0Njqvu_eb20g9a0@z> > >> Their product does not depend on Cygwin, but it does provide >> switches to use Cygwin headers and libraries for porting purposes. >> The fact is they got a commercial F77 and F90 which can use Cygwin >> headers and libraries, makes it a really attractive product. > >In that case, it still acts to mkae cygwin more popular, which >hopefully means that more people will use it in general, etc. > Absolutely true. I guess PGi is the only product right now which offers a Cygwin compability, with F77/F90 and HPF for single and multiprocessors machines. That was the reason i decided to go for it. To be honest G77 still lags behind a normal F77 compiler. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com