From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mumit Khan To: Anders Norlander Cc: Jonathan Pryor , Cygwin Mailing List Subject: Re: Compiled executable differences between 9x and NT Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 07:08:00 -0000 Message-id: <199903111508.JAA27393@modi.xraylith.wisc.edu> In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:02:20 +0100." < 36E7DAFC.7D1AE3AC@hem2.passagen.se > References: <36E7DAFC.7D1AE3AC@hem2.passagen.se> X-SW-Source: 1999-03/msg00352.html Anders Norlander writes: > > I have a w95 system (haven't tested on NT) similar to yours (4.00.950 B > and IE 4.0 xx) and it crashes for me as well. > > This suggests that there might be some problem with this setup > or it could be something completely different. > Could someone test it on a Win95 B (I know it works on Win95 A) *without* IE 4.0 and see if it still works? I wonder if IE is the deciding factor here. Regards, Mumit -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mumit Khan To: Anders Norlander Cc: Jonathan Pryor , Cygwin Mailing List Subject: Re: Compiled executable differences between 9x and NT Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 19:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <199903111508.JAA27393@modi.xraylith.wisc.edu> References: <36E7DAFC.7D1AE3AC@hem2.passagen.se> X-SW-Source: 1999-03n/msg00352.html Message-ID: <19990331194500.QKibNHx7dUKbTmGZ8dJVgk2vZjl4ernuZpx1g-OrjWA@z> Anders Norlander writes: > > I have a w95 system (haven't tested on NT) similar to yours (4.00.950 B > and IE 4.0 xx) and it crashes for me as well. > > This suggests that there might be some problem with this setup > or it could be something completely different. > Could someone test it on a Win95 B (I know it works on Win95 A) *without* IE 4.0 and see if it still works? I wonder if IE is the deciding factor here. Regards, Mumit -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com