From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastien Barre To: Charles Wilson Cc: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: Compiling Perl under b20.1 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 19:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <4.1.19990308113609.016b8c00@mail.club-internet.fr> References: <19990306184033.2269.rocketmail@send1e.yahoomail.com> <4.1.19990307154058.016d0040@mail.club-internet.fr> <36E37A18.A15F8524@ece.gatech.edu> X-SW-Source: 1999-03n/msg00222.html Message-ID: <19990331194500.-AgA5yUd9bv20CQi51tp29aC0crxXlwHyjfyg4Yu8SE@z> At 02:19 08/03/99 -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >WOW! You haven't been working on this all day, have you? Both of us :) >Let me summarize, and see if I've got this straight: >(1) according to Earnie Boyd (but contradicted by Pierre Humblet) [...] >all of your tests were either CYGWIN=binmode or >CYGWIN=________, not CYGWIN=nobinmode, you really weren't changing anything >here. Sadly. I should have used nobinmode. I'll try. >Okay, digging into the stat.t code: You failed tests 18-20 and 26 in stat.t. >Tests 18-20 are testing (readable by owner?) (writeable by owner?) and (executable by >owner) after doing a chmod 0700. I can't remember if I was building perl >under the Administrator account or under my normal NT user account. But, the "everything >created by a member of the Administrators group belongs to the group, not >the user" NTism may be the culprit here. Yes, seems to me too, but I thought 'ntea' could solve this (see other email "'ntea' CHECK please). >My conclusions are the same as yours: > (1) Earnie is right ==> binmode has no effect > (2) binary mounted / text mounted don't affect the build, only the runtime >behavior and tests. Why is another question. OK for me at this time (+ a free headache). ______________________________________________________________ Sebastien Barre http://www.hds.utc.fr/~barre/ -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com