public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards@jaj.com>
To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com, John.Wiersba@medstat.com
Subject: RE: cat broken
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:37:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <199906241647.MAA19444@jaj.com> (raw)

> > > Using the 5/23 cygwin1.dll, the following is broken:
> > > 	cat >file
> > > It echos the input typed from the terminal
> > 
> > Uh, that's what is supposed to happen... unless you mean that it ONLY
> > echos the input, and writes a zero-length file?
>
> No, "cat >file" should take input from stdin (the terminal) and write it to
> file, which in fact is what happens with the 1/15 cygwin1.dll.  However, the
> 5/23 dll echos the input from terminal back to the terminal.

Let me try again.  On any and every Unix,

   $ cat > file
   This is a test.
   ^D
   $ 

should echo to the screen as well as write to the file.  You will be hard
pressed to not get that stuff echoed on the screen.  I'm /hoping/ that your
problem is that cat is /only/ echoing to the screen and not /also/ writing
a file.  Check?


Now, the errors that you're seeing after replacing the DLL (those freaky
trace thingies) are indeed due to a mismatch between a binary and the DLL.
That's the only major problem with using the inst snapshots; it's harder
to keep things in sync (e.g., backing out replacements, or not getting a
new binary with a new DLL).  How you as an end user manage that is largely
a matter of taste -- copying directory structures and updating a copy, or
reinstalling original binaries from a distribution, or just living with
the nonfatal errors, etc, etc.


(If you reply to the list, please DON'T cc another copy to me.  Thanks!)
Phil


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards@jaj.com>
To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com, John.Wiersba@medstat.com
Subject: RE: cat broken
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <199906241647.MAA19444@jaj.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <19990630221000.Soa0bliXHWnpF705DLpq8TMqzR7pkCpaqydIxH84xZU@z> (raw)

> > > Using the 5/23 cygwin1.dll, the following is broken:
> > > 	cat >file
> > > It echos the input typed from the terminal
> > 
> > Uh, that's what is supposed to happen... unless you mean that it ONLY
> > echos the input, and writes a zero-length file?
>
> No, "cat >file" should take input from stdin (the terminal) and write it to
> file, which in fact is what happens with the 1/15 cygwin1.dll.  However, the
> 5/23 dll echos the input from terminal back to the terminal.

Let me try again.  On any and every Unix,

   $ cat > file
   This is a test.
   ^D
   $ 

should echo to the screen as well as write to the file.  You will be hard
pressed to not get that stuff echoed on the screen.  I'm /hoping/ that your
problem is that cat is /only/ echoing to the screen and not /also/ writing
a file.  Check?


Now, the errors that you're seeing after replacing the DLL (those freaky
trace thingies) are indeed due to a mismatch between a binary and the DLL.
That's the only major problem with using the inst snapshots; it's harder
to keep things in sync (e.g., backing out replacements, or not getting a
new binary with a new DLL).  How you as an end user manage that is largely
a matter of taste -- copying directory structures and updating a copy, or
reinstalling original binaries from a distribution, or just living with
the nonfatal errors, etc, etc.


(If you reply to the list, please DON'T cc another copy to me.  Thanks!)
Phil


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

             reply	other threads:[~1999-06-24  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-06-24  9:37 Phil Edwards [this message]
1999-06-30 22:10 ` Phil Edwards
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-06-24 15:57 John Wiersba
1999-06-30 22:10 ` John Wiersba
1999-06-24 12:03 John Wiersba
1999-06-24 12:11 ` Chris Faylor
1999-06-30 22:10   ` Chris Faylor
1999-06-30 22:10 ` John Wiersba
1999-06-24 10:56 Earnie Boyd
1999-06-30 22:10 ` Earnie Boyd
1999-06-24 10:00 John Wiersba
1999-06-30 22:10 ` John Wiersba
1999-06-24  8:18 John Wiersba
1999-06-24  8:29 ` Dr. Volker Zell
1999-06-30 22:10   ` Dr. Volker Zell
1999-06-24 11:51 ` Chris Faylor
1999-06-30 22:10   ` Chris Faylor
1999-06-30 22:10 ` John Wiersba
1999-06-23 15:47 John Wiersba
1999-06-30 22:10 ` John Wiersba
1999-06-23 14:52 Phil Edwards
1999-06-30 22:10 ` Phil Edwards
1999-06-23 12:42 John Wiersba
1999-06-24  0:49 ` Dr. Volker Zell
1999-06-30 22:10   ` Dr. Volker Zell
1999-06-30 22:10 ` John Wiersba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=199906241647.MAA19444@jaj.com \
    --to=pedwards@jaj.com \
    --cc=John.Wiersba@medstat.com \
    --cc=cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).