From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Emanuele Aliberti" To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com, ssiddiqi@ipass.net Subject: Re: FW: Description of the new 'ntsec' feature Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 08:49:00 -0000 Message-id: <19990822154916.23746.qmail@hotmail.com> X-SW-Source: 1999-08/msg00522.html >The philosophy was that we could get real ownership and real executable >bits and real UNIX permissions. Does it use the POSIX_SEMANTICS flag when managing files stored in ntfs volumes? Doesn't it run the x-ed image in the NT's native POSIX server? ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Emanuele Aliberti" To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com, ssiddiqi@ipass.net Subject: Re: FW: Description of the new 'ntsec' feature Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 23:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <19990822154916.23746.qmail@hotmail.com> X-SW-Source: 1999-08n/msg00522.html Message-ID: <19990831234900.PKydc_tdETv-dWZ_YvGw4b2c5wlfL3PGZF8S1OxXz4g@z> >The philosophy was that we could get real ownership and real executable >bits and real UNIX permissions. Does it use the POSIX_SEMANTICS flag when managing files stored in ntfs volumes? Doesn't it run the x-ed image in the NT's native POSIX server? ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com