From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 36693 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2016 12:03:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 36683 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jan 2016 12:03:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:535, lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk, lloydwoodyahoocouk, H*r:envelope-sender X-HELO: etr-usa.com Received: from etr-usa.com (HELO etr-usa.com) (130.94.180.135) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:03:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 10147 invoked by uid 13447); 29 Jan 2016 12:03:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO polypore.west.etr-usa.com) ([73.26.17.49]) (envelope-sender ) by 130.94.180.135 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 29 Jan 2016 12:03:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: CVS problems on 64-bit cygwin From: Warren Young In-Reply-To: <56AB180B.9000107@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:16:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1E11BE1E-5603-453D-9C7F-6F9AEF05F5D1@etr-usa.com> References: <1484485633.2967908.1454040691361.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1484485633.2967908.1454040691361.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <56AB180B.9000107@gmail.com> To: The Cygwin Mailing List X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-01/txt/msg00466.txt.bz2 On Jan 29, 2016, at 12:43 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: >=20 > On 29/01/2016 05:11, lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk wrote: >>=20 >> Under 64-bit cygwin, this doesn't work; I never get a password prompt. >=20 > try with > CVS_RSH=3D"ssh"; export CVS_RSH Good call. I set CVS_RSH in my .bash_profile so long ago I forgot about it. This probably explains why the OP sees the problem change when moving from = Cygwin 32 to Cygwin 64: he probably doesn=E2=80=99t use the same shell star= tup scripts in both cases. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple