From: Geoffrey Noer <noer@cygnus.com>
To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Cygwin performance (was [ANN] PW32 the...)
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000313180831.I8690@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38CD87BE.B69B05A7@sigma6.com>
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000, Jeff Sturm wrote:
[...]
> Don't be so sure. I've used GCC on Interix for a while... let's just
> say that Cygwin rocks.
>
> The Interix product relies heavily on the POSIX subsystem, instead of
> shared memory as Cygwin does. For many of my user applications the
> subsystem process actually consumes more CPU time than the application!
[...]
Interesting. We have been trying to improve (and succeeding in
improving) Cygwin's runtime performance but that's been done comparing
Cygwin to Cygwin-past and not so much by doing benchmarks against
other systems I think.
Have people run any benchmarks comparing Cygwin, Uwin, NuTcracker,
Interix, anything else out there?
--
Geoffrey Noer Email: noer@cygnus.com
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company http://www.redhat.com/
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-03-13 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-03-13 10:04 [ANN] PW32 the (alternative) Posix-over-Win32 layer 0.3.0 released Earnie Boyd
2000-03-13 11:21 ` Re[2]: " Paul Sokolovsky
2000-03-13 15:16 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2000-03-13 15:56 ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-13 16:23 ` Jeff Sturm
2000-03-13 18:08 ` Geoffrey Noer [this message]
2000-03-14 16:29 ` Cygwin performance (was [ANN] PW32 the...) Scott Blachowicz
2000-03-14 21:04 ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-15 0:05 ` Re[2]: " Egor Duda
2000-03-13 16:13 ` [ANN] PW32 the (alternative) Posix-over-Win32 layer 0.3.0 released Jeff Sturm
2000-03-13 16:17 ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-13 15:01 ` Re[2]: [ANN] PW32 the (alternative) Posix-over-Win32 layer 0.3.0 r Michael Hirmke
2000-03-15 13:43 Cygwin performance (was [ANN] PW32 the...) Heribert Dahms
2000-03-15 14:01 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2000-03-16 9:32 ` Scott Blachowicz
2000-03-16 10:22 ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-16 10:26 Chris Nappi
2000-03-16 10:43 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000313180831.I8690@cygnus.com \
--to=noer@cygnus.com \
--cc=cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).