public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Faylor <cgf@cygnus.com>
To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [ANN] PW32 the (alternative) Posix-over-Win32 layer 0.3.0 released
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 16:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000313191704.A10551@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38CD856B.BCF415C2@sigma6.com>

On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 07:18:51PM -0500, Jeff Sturm wrote:
>Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
>> Personally, I think posting comparative data is useful to this list...
>
>So do I.  If it mentions Cygwin, it's relevant... if it doesn't mention
>Cygwin, it's not appropriate for this list... at least that's what
>others seem to be saying, and I tend to agree.
>
>Speaking for myself... I don't mind the occaisional off-topic
>announcement, but there is always a danger that they can snowball into a
>long non-relevant discussion thread, subverting the real purpose of this
>list.  I've seen it happen elsewhere.

So have I.  That's my primary concern.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

  reply	other threads:[~2000-03-13 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-03-13 10:04 Earnie Boyd
2000-03-13 11:21 ` Re[2]: " Paul Sokolovsky
2000-03-13 15:16   ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2000-03-13 15:56     ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-13 16:23       ` Jeff Sturm
2000-03-13 18:08         ` Cygwin performance (was [ANN] PW32 the...) Geoffrey Noer
2000-03-14 16:29           ` Scott Blachowicz
2000-03-14 21:04             ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-15  0:05             ` Re[2]: " Egor Duda
2000-03-13 16:13     ` [ANN] PW32 the (alternative) Posix-over-Win32 layer 0.3.0 released Jeff Sturm
2000-03-13 16:17       ` Chris Faylor [this message]
2000-03-13 15:01 ` Re[2]: [ANN] PW32 the (alternative) Posix-over-Win32 layer 0.3.0 r Michael Hirmke
     [not found] <;>
     [not found] ` <from>
     [not found]   ` <on>
1997-03-24 10:32     ` Windows API calls that don't work? (Was RE: Stupid stupi David W Palmer
     [not found]       ` <Mar>
     [not found]         ` <13,>
     [not found]           ` <2000>
     [not found]             ` <at>
     [not found]               ` <11:56:00PM>
     [not found]                 ` <+0200>
2000-03-13 15:34                   ` [ANN] PW32 the (alternative) Posix-over-Win32 layer 0.3.0 released Michael Hirmke
2000-03-13 15:52                     ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-14 13:06                       ` Michael Hirmke
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-03-13  5:16 Paul Sokolovsky
2000-03-13  8:05 ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-13  9:03   ` Dr. Volker Zell
2000-03-13 15:01   ` Michael Hirmke
2000-03-13 15:05     ` Chris Faylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20000313191704.A10551@cygnus.com \
    --to=cgf@cygnus.com \
    --cc=cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).