From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Faylor To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: Cygwin performance (was [ANN] PW32 the...) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 21:04:00 -0000 Message-id: <20000315000403.A3982@cygnus.com> References: <20000313180414.15800.qmail@web107.yahoomail.com> <9886.000313@is.lg.ua> <4.3.2.20000313181326.00b8a590@pop.ma.ultranet.com> <20000313185555.B24233@cygnus.com> <38CD87BE.B69B05A7@sigma6.com> <20000313180831.I8690@cygnus.com> <19940315002847.279871F1B@sabami.seaslug.org> X-SW-Source: 2000-03/msg00333.html On Mon, Mar 14, 1994 at 04:28:47PM -0800, Scott Blachowicz wrote: >Geoffrey Noer wrote: > >> ... >> Interesting. We have been trying to improve (and succeeding in improving) >> Cygwin's runtime performance but that's been done comparing Cygwin to >> Cygwin-past and not so much by doing benchmarks against other systems I >> think. > >Great! Have you found any way to improve the performance of commands like 'ls' >against remotely mounted file systems? I frequently have things like I think Geoff was referring to improvements that are already in Cygwin. If you don't see any changes then there aren't any improvements. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com