public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* No more //c
@ 2001-09-06  3:09 frederick.page
  2001-09-06  3:16 ` Adrian Carter
  2001-09-06  3:20 ` Corinna Vinschen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: frederick.page @ 2001-09-06  3:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

Hi there,

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2001/msg00109.html says
about the upcoming changes in Cygwin 1.3.3:

Briefly, the problem with using //x to refer to drive x is that it
clashes with Windows' use of // to denote a network share.  So a system
called 'x' on your network was previously inaccessible to cygwin.


I'm not sure, whether this new change is necessary at all: to my
understanding, Windows uses the non-standard backslash, a network
share would be noted here as \\Sharename (and *not* //Sharename).

Am I missing something?

Kind regards    Frederick


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: No more //c
  2001-09-06  3:09 No more //c frederick.page
@ 2001-09-06  3:16 ` Adrian Carter
  2001-09-06  3:20 ` Corinna Vinschen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Carter @ 2001-09-06  3:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: frederick.page, cygwin

At 12:09 PM 6/09/2001 +0100, frederick.page@amb-informatik.de wrote:
>Hi there,
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2001/msg00109.html says
>about the upcoming changes in Cygwin 1.3.3:
>
>Briefly, the problem with using //x to refer to drive x is that it
>clashes with Windows' use of // to denote a network share.  So a system
>called 'x' on your network was previously inaccessible to cygwin.

Perhaps clashes is being used in a 'looks real bad when seen in a list of 
resources that also contains SMB shares'. i.e:

//x/blah
\\blah\x

Kinda confusing... to a 'dummy' it could easily be seen perhaps as a typo.

Im guessin.

Adrian



>I'm not sure, whether this new change is necessary at all: to my
>understanding, Windows uses the non-standard backslash, a network
>share would be noted here as \\Sharename (and *not* //Sharename).
>
>Am I missing something?
>
>Kind regards    Frederick
>
>
>--
>Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
>Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Adrian Carter
Senior Support Engineer  LIDCAM

Performance Networking Solutions by LIDCAM -
Lucent, Sun / Cobalt, Extreme, Netopia, Nortel / Alteon, Redback, 
Cacheflow, Sendmail

Voice: 02 9922 7066 / 0410 577 049 / Fax: 02 9922 7071
adrian@lidcam.com.au / www.lidcam.com.au
Mail: Suite 5, Level 11, 100 Walker St, Nth Sydney, NSW, 2060
----------------------------------------------------------------
This communication (email) & files transmitted with it are privileged & 
confidential information intended solely for the addressee. No infringement 
of this firm's rights in respect to this confidential information will be 
permitted. No liability is accepted for damage caused in the transmission 
of this email.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: No more //c
  2001-09-06  3:09 No more //c frederick.page
  2001-09-06  3:16 ` Adrian Carter
@ 2001-09-06  3:20 ` Corinna Vinschen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Corinna Vinschen @ 2001-09-06  3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 12:09:08PM +0100, frederick.page@amb-informatik.de wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2001/msg00109.html says
> about the upcoming changes in Cygwin 1.3.3:
> 
> Briefly, the problem with using //x to refer to drive x is that it
> clashes with Windows' use of // to denote a network share.  So a system
> called 'x' on your network was previously inaccessible to cygwin.
> 
> 
> I'm not sure, whether this new change is necessary at all: to my
> understanding, Windows uses the non-standard backslash, a network
> share would be noted here as \\Sharename (and *not* //Sharename).
> 
> Am I missing something?

Yep. When you use a POSIX like path it's translated into a
Win32 path inside of Cygwin. So //x becomes \\x. Moreover,
at least NT understand / in paths, too, so it would translate
it internally to \ and it would again hit \\x.

The \\x syntax is too ambiguous so it is deprecated since at
least two years. We're just doing the obvious step to drop it
completely now.

Again, if that's still unclear: You can use mount to get rid
of the "/cygdrive":

	mount --change-cygdrive-prefix /

and if you want these automatic mount points being binary mounts:

	mount -b --change-cygdrive-prefix /

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-09-06  3:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-09-06  3:09 No more //c frederick.page
2001-09-06  3:16 ` Adrian Carter
2001-09-06  3:20 ` Corinna Vinschen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).