From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: press for cygwin Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 14:43:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010907174356.A4262@redhat.com> References: <17B78BDF120BD411B70100500422FC6309E334@IIS000> <3B939A12.5040009@ece.gatech.edu> <20010903111442.D2024@redhat.com> <3B9506C5.C6FAD015@etr-usa.com> <20010904155203.C7509@redhat.com> <3B96CB9C.9453D3CF@etr-usa.com> <3B991F83.4DC7D708@etr-usa.com> <20010907153527.A1796@redhat.com> <3B993A9A.486F61D1@etr-usa.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00351.html On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 03:22:34PM -0600, Warren Young wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>You should have received this bounce message: > >Yes. Then I went to the Mailing Lists page to subscribe, where I saw >that the list was described as "invitation only", so I sent the patch >here. I see that the mailing lists page was changed in the last day or >so, though, to remove that restriction. I just changed it. However it didn't say "by invitation only", it said "by approval only". I realized that must have been what was concerning you so I removed the words. I was filtering subscription requests to this mailing list for a while but it looked like the only people who subscribe now are ones who are actually interested in submitting patches. So, I just let everything through. I wish I could say the same for cygwin-developers. For some reason people seem to want to insist that cygwin-developers is a bug-reporting maiilng list. And, then to argue with me when I inform them that that is not its purpose. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/