From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Moxham To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: setup Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 12:53:00 -0000 Message-id: <200109151953.UAA26633@malus.maths.soton.ac.uk> X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00842.html >From J.L.Moxham@maths.soton.ac.uk Sat Sep 15 20:34 BST 2001 Received: from malus.maths.soton.ac.uk (malus.maths.soton.ac.uk [152.78.40.173]) by midwife.maths.soton.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA16525; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 20:34:25 +0100 (BST) From: Jason Moxham Received: (from jlm@localhost) by malus.maths.soton.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id UAA26603; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 20:34:24 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200109151934.UAA26603@malus.maths.soton.ac.uk> Subject: setup To: cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 20:34:24 +0100 (BST) Cc: j.l.moxham@maths.soton.ac.uk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Length: 549 I have a dll problem which I think might be fixed by the latest binutils , so I tryied to find a mirror which had the latest . While I was going thru each mirror to see which has the update I noticed that some of them had an older version of "setup" , which when run gave incorrect "new" packages , perhaps these sites should be taken off the mirrors list , you do get a warning about it being an older version of setup , but that shouldn't affect what pakages are considered "newer" , should it? Jason Moxham j.l.moxham@maths.soton.ac.uk -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/