From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: new site for my ports is up
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 08:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011117173257.GB23168@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011117172920.GA23168@redhat.com>
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 12:29:20PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 04:15:56PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>>My mail is currently broken inbound... so I'm replying from the list
>>archives..
>>
>>===
>>Ah! Sorry about that.
>>
>>The idea of putting things under categories was something that I
>>originally proposed but I wasn't entirely sure that it was ok.
>>
>>I wonder if we shouldn't just dispense with any hierarchy at all and put
>>all of the packages in their own subdirectory, like ftp.gnu.org?
>>
>>cgf
>>===
>>
>>A flat structure may not scale efficiently on some systems. I was (for
>>obvious reasons I hope) against a category based directory structure,
>>but pretty much anything else should be fine :].
>>
>>As for putting multiple pacakges in the same dir - yes thats good but
>>let me get setup.hint subsumed into the package file first...
>
>No. No multiple packages in the same directory. Every package gets
>their own directory.
Just to clarify: By "no multiple packages", I mean that I don't want to
see (to pick an extreme example) ash-blah.tar.bz2 and
binutils-blah-tar.bz2 in an ash+binutils directory.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-17 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-11 8:26 Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Christopher Faylor [this message]
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Charles Wilson
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Christopher Faylor
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-11 8:26 David A. Cobb
2001-11-11 8:26 Gerrit P. Haase
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Charles Wilson
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Gerrit P. Haase
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Charles Wilson
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` John Marshall
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Charles Wilson
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Charles Wilson
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Jochen Küpper
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Jochen Küpper
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Gerrit P. Haase
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011117173257.GB23168@redhat.com \
--to=cgf@redhat.com \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).