Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected

[Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 06:52:07PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:59:21AM -0500, Chris Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 03:24:49PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>> >Then search cygdll.a after those symbols and extract only the relevant
>> >d000xxx.o from cygdll.a to a newly created import library named
>> >libpthread.a or other revelant name.
>> 
>> And, here is where I don't understand your confusion.  You don't need to
>> search cygdll.a.  You already have a text file available to you which
>> contains all of the exports from the cygwin DLL -- cygwin.def.
>
>Which results in some missing symbols in libc.a, namely the symbols
>from $(LIBCOS).  The change to have different link libs have let me
>think that we could drop -lcygwin from the gcc specs file in favour
>of -lc.  But that's impossible w/o $(LIBCOS) linked to libc.a.  Did
>I missunderstood something here?

Yes.  We're not dropping libcygwin.a in favor of libc.a.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/