* RE: sourceware.cygnus.com alias for sources.redhat.com going away
@ 2002-01-04 5:19 Roth, Kevin P.
2002-01-04 9:13 ` sources.redhat.com " Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Roth, Kevin P. @ 2002-01-04 5:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
What about cygwin.com? Is that a more-or-less permanent alias for
sources.redhat.com? I've always wondered why you always referred to the
redhat address, when the cygwin one seems to be used more (it appears
you sent your announcement to cyg-ann@cygwin.com for instance), and is
more specific to the project, and besides, it's shorter...
Just curious I guess,
--KEvin
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 6:14 PM
To: cygwin-announce@cygwin.com
Subject: sourceware.cygnus.com alias for sources.redhat.com going away
We've kept the old "sourceware.cygnus.com" host name around for two
years now but it is going away very soon.
So, if you are using the name sourceware.cygnus.com for ftp, email,
rsync, ssh, web, etc., please change over to using sources.redhat.com
ASAP.
Just to be clear, you'll still continue to receive email from
sources.redhat.com after the host name has been deactivated but if you
try to *send* email to an address like cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com,
your email will bounce.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: sources.redhat.com alias for sources.redhat.com going away
2002-01-04 5:19 sourceware.cygnus.com alias for sources.redhat.com going away Roth, Kevin P.
@ 2002-01-04 9:13 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2002-01-04 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 08:18:57AM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
>What about cygwin.com? Is that a more-or-less permanent alias for
>sources.redhat.com? I've always wondered why you always referred to the
>redhat address, when the cygwin one seems to be used more (it appears
>you sent your announcement to cyg-ann@cygwin.com for instance), and is
>more specific to the project, and besides, it's shorter...
Who's "always" referring to the redhat address? Most (all?) of my email
refers to cygwin.com. The announcement *itself* used cygwin.com as the
return address.com. The help at the bottom of every message refers to
cygwin.com. The messages that I send to cygwin-announce mention
cygwin.com.
The cygwin.com alias for sources.redhat.com has nothing to do with
"sourceware.cygnus.com".
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-04 17:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-04 5:19 sourceware.cygnus.com alias for sources.redhat.com going away Roth, Kevin P.
2002-01-04 9:13 ` sources.redhat.com " Christopher Faylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).