From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14607 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2002 09:18:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 14279 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2002 09:18:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygbert.vinschen.de) (217.81.222.174) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Mar 2002 09:18:27 -0000 Received: (from corinna@localhost) by cygbert.vinschen.de (8.11.6/8.9.3/Linux sendmail 8.9.3) id g259IPg21879 for cygwin@cygwin.com; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 10:18:25 +0100 Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 01:18:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: CygWin Subject: Re: sshd useful on cygwin??? Message-ID: <20020305101825.O13590@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: CygWin References: <3C83CA21.7E0959B9@lapo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C83CA21.7E0959B9@lapo.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00239.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 08:25:22PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: > It's a pity that you can tunnel only using sshd in "single user" (i.e. runing > it as your user and not as "system")... it's useful to have complete graphical > access using www.ThightVNC.com =) > > BTW: Corinna is this accurate? is that patch with semi-authentication to have > TCP access from system user already in? Sorry, but I don't understand what you're talking about. sshd is typically running as system and you can authenticate using any account, even system. You can run an interactive session as user system. It's obviously no problem to have a tunnel running under system account then... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/