public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Setup causes illegal operation on Win 95 (new version worked)
       [not found] <6DCADC91.72740CDE.28E4037A@netscape.net>
@ 2002-05-07 16:54 ` Sukhwinder Singh
  2002-05-07 17:43   ` Christopher Faylor
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sukhwinder Singh @ 2002-05-07 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

>Windows 95 works well in a dual-boot configuration with Linux.
>Therefore, my suggestion is precisely that. If you do, there
>will be no need to use cygwin

Yes I have Installed Red Hat Linux 7.1 and windows both. I had to use cygwin
because for compilation of libmcrypt extension of php on Windows I needed
cygwin. Libmcrypt doesn't provide windows vc++ projects(dsp) to compile it.

Only reason for me not to use Linux for development is because there is no
good editor available for Linux. So, without a good editor, development on
Linux is not as easy as it is on windows. Using editplus
(http://www.editplus.com) we can compile source code of almost all languages
with a single click of a button. Gvim and Emacs are good but not as good as
some windows editors such as Editplus.

Also, Gvim and Kwrite are not as responsive as editplus. For example if I
press page down key and don't release it and suddenly I find what I was
looking for and release the key then Gvim doesn't stop before completing all
page down events. KWrite is dead slow. Also we have to learn those keyboard
shortcuts to use vim and emacs.

If something similar to editplus was available on Linux I will never use
windows again. There are some java editors available like Jedit but they are
very resource hungry. And don't work well on my slow computer. If anyone
knows about a good editor for Linux similar to editplus then please tell me.

Sukhwinder


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Setup causes illegal operation on Win 95 (new version worked)
  2002-05-07 16:54 ` Setup causes illegal operation on Win 95 (new version worked) Sukhwinder Singh
@ 2002-05-07 17:43   ` Christopher Faylor
  2002-05-07 17:50     ` Sukhwinder Singh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2002-05-07 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin; +Cc: ssruprai

On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 05:03:55PM +0530, Sukhwinder Singh wrote:
>>Windows 95 works well in a dual-boot configuration with Linux.
>>Therefore, my suggestion is precisely that.  If you do, there will be
>>no need to use cygwin
>
>Yes I have Installed Red Hat Linux 7.1 and windows both.  I had to use
>cygwin because for compilation of libmcrypt extension of php on Windows
>I needed cygwin.  Libmcrypt doesn't provide windows vc++ projects(dsp)
>to compile it.
>
>Only reason for me not to use Linux for development is because there is
>no good editor available for Linux.  So, without a good editor,
>development on Linux is not as easy as it is on windows.  Using
>editplus (http://www.editplus.com) we can compile source code of almost
>all languages with a single click of a button.  Gvim and Emacs are good
>but not as good as some windows editors such as Editplus.
>
>Also, Gvim and Kwrite are not as responsive as editplus.  For example
>if I press page down key and don't release it and suddenly I find what
>I was looking for and release the key then Gvim doesn't stop before
>completing all page down events.  KWrite is dead slow.  Also we have to
>learn those keyboard shortcuts to use vim and emacs.
>
>If something similar to editplus was available on Linux I will never
>use windows again.  There are some java editors available like Jedit
>but they are very resource hungry.  And don't work well on my slow
>computer.  If anyone knows about a good editor for Linux similar to
>editplus then please tell me.

Sigh.  If you're interested in linux programs, use a linux mailing list.
Isn't it blindingly obvious that this is a list for discussion about
CYGWIN?

There are all sorts of forums available for linux.  You don't need to
pollute this list with this kind of off-topic discussion.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Setup causes illegal operation on Win 95 (new version worked)
  2002-05-07 17:43   ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2002-05-07 17:50     ` Sukhwinder Singh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sukhwinder Singh @ 2002-05-07 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

Hello,
    I never wanted to pollute this list with off topic discussion. I talked
about this only because you started it and asked me to use Linux.

Thank you for help.

Sukhwinder Singh

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-08  0:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <6DCADC91.72740CDE.28E4037A@netscape.net>
2002-05-07 16:54 ` Setup causes illegal operation on Win 95 (new version worked) Sukhwinder Singh
2002-05-07 17:43   ` Christopher Faylor
2002-05-07 17:50     ` Sukhwinder Singh

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).