From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2232 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2002 19:31:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 2211 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2002 19:31:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO drmonroe.pentek.org) (167.206.56.82) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Jul 2002 19:31:53 -0000 Received: FROM homer.pentek.org BY drmonroe.pentek.org ; Mon Jul 08 15:31:51 2002 -0400 Received: (from charles@localhost) by homer.pentek.org (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id PAA10015 for cygwin@cygwin.com; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:31:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: homer.pentek.org: charles set sender to charles@pentek.com using -f Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 13:02:00 -0000 From: Charles Krug To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: New Mutt 1.4 package??? Message-ID: <20020708193151.GE8019@pentek.com> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20020708172344.5209C6D9B0@www.fastmail.fm> <20020708184958.42802.qmail@web21008.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708184958.42802.qmail@web21008.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00583.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 11:49:58AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > --- Tom Halser wrote: > > Who's the maintainer of the mutt package? > > I think some of us would love to see the new mutt 1.4 as part of > > cygwin. > Tom, > > Please use the mailing-list archives. This subject has been discussed in > the past. I'm sure when Jason is ready to, he will release mutt-1.4. > Until then, might I suggest pine? > mutt builds OOTB now. I recommend that you at least attempt to build it yourself. I find that I don't use all of the features Jason includes. Consequently, my build is a good bit faster on my older (200MHz) machine. mutt --version will give you starting points for all the build options. YMMV, of course, and when I put a copy on a faster machine, I'm likely not to care about the fairly small performance difference. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/