public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Available for test: gcc-3.1.1-2 gcc2-2.95.3-8
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020711152331.GA8291@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020711131751.76665.qmail@web21003.mail.yahoo.com>

On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 06:17:51AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>
>--- Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> wrote:
>[SNIP]
>
>Chris,
>
>When I do gcc -v, gcc prints out the following:
>
>Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.1.1/specs
>Configured with: /netrel/src/gcc-3.1.1-2/configure
>--enable-languages=c,c++,f77,java --enable-libgcj --enable-threads=posix
>--with-system-zlib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext
>--disable-shared --enable-interpreter --disable-sjlj-exceptions
>--disable-version-specific-runtime-libs --build=i686-pc-linux
>--host=i686-pc-cygwin --target=i686-pc-cygwin --enable-haifa --prefix=/usr
>--exec-prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --libdir=/usr/lib
>--includedir=/nonexistent/include --libexecdir=/usr/sbin : 
>                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>(reconfigured) 
>Thread model: posix
>gcc version 3.1.1 20020710 (prerelease)
>
>Shouldn't that be /usr/include?  The only reason I ask is because I'm
>quite certain that this could cause troubl in configure scripts.  Like
>I've noticed that if I don't explicitly pass CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/include" to
>my configure scripts, they'll miss the limits.h in /usr/include and use
>the one in /usr/lib/gcc-lib/...../include/ instead.  This goes for some
>other header detection as well.  I believe it is due to the compiler's
>internal search paths.  Just thought I'd report that observation.

This is basically the same configure script that I have been using for
two years, so I doubt that it will cause problems.

The limits.h file in /usr/lib/gcc-lib/../include/ *is* the one that is
supposed to be used.  It includes the /usr/include/limits.h file
automatically.

Are you saying that when I announced that the limits.h problem was
fixed, I was wrong?  I specifically checked the -E output from a
program and saw that /usr/include/limits.h was pulled in specifically.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-11 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-11  2:19 Christopher Faylor
2002-07-11  3:47 ` Charles Wilson
2002-07-11  3:49   ` Charles Wilson
2002-07-11  6:47     ` Nicholas Wourms
2002-07-11  8:26       ` Charles Wilson
2002-07-11 20:26     ` Christopher Faylor
2002-07-11 20:50       ` Christopher Faylor
2002-07-11 10:19   ` Christopher Faylor
2002-07-11 11:56     ` Charles Wilson
2002-07-11 21:09       ` Christopher Faylor
2002-07-11 21:33         ` Unscrible--liangalei@CS.SJTU.EDU.CN liangalei
2002-07-11 23:59         ` Available for test: gcc-3.1.1-2 gcc2-2.95.3-8 Charles Wilson
2002-07-12  0:27           ` Christopher Faylor
2002-07-12  0:31             ` Charles Wilson
2002-07-12  1:32               ` Christopher Faylor
2002-07-12  2:54                 ` Charles Wilson
2002-07-12  4:40                   ` Christopher Faylor
2002-07-12  9:22                     ` Charles Wilson
2002-07-12 18:46                       ` Christopher Faylor
2002-07-12  7:27               ` Nicholas Wourms
2002-07-15  0:55   ` Charles Wilson
2002-07-15  1:09     ` Christopher Faylor
2002-07-15  8:02       ` Nicholas Wourms
2002-07-15 11:56         ` Charles Wilson
2002-07-15 12:36           ` Nicholas Wourms
2002-07-11  7:19 ` Nicholas Wourms
2002-07-11  9:05   ` Christopher Faylor [this message]
2002-07-11 14:26     ` Nicholas Wourms
2002-07-11  8:49 ` Pavel Tsekov
2002-07-12  2:38   ` Christopher Faylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020711152331.GA8291@redhat.com \
    --to=cgf@redhat.com \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).