* Setup.exe: plans and progress? @ 2002-07-16 4:42 luke.kendall 2002-07-16 5:27 ` Pavel Tsekov 2002-07-16 5:43 ` Robert Collins 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: luke.kendall @ 2002-07-16 4:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin I was just wondering how the work on setup is progressing? Specifically, I'm wondering about the ease of use when trying to install everything. A lot of the recent work seems to have concentrated on other issues. The PC sysadmins here have had a little gentle arm twisting, to include a Cygwin install on each new Windows PC that gets set up. The Cygwin install works off a local install directory that gets updated every few months. But today I discovered that what is actually getting installed is the default (tiny!) configuration. A key issue is the length of time it would take to click through each option (skip/keep/ver-w.x.y-z/ver-w'.x'.y'-z'/...) of every package, to install the "right" version (the one with the largest version number?), for every new PC. (The rest of the install and configuration is far more automted.) Is this just a function of the way I've installed Cygwin on the local server? Is there some way when setting that up, so that the 1st install from that local machine to fresh new machines on the LAN take its configuration (install everything) as the default? As I understand it, subsequent updates to a PC after the initial installation are easy. They'll just update whatever was installed, by default. Our trouble is that the *first* install seems very click-intensive - it's not very automatic. Any suggestions would be welcome. Thanks, luke -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Setup.exe: plans and progress? 2002-07-16 4:42 Setup.exe: plans and progress? luke.kendall @ 2002-07-16 5:27 ` Pavel Tsekov 2002-07-18 3:08 ` luke.kendall 2002-07-16 5:43 ` Robert Collins 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Pavel Tsekov @ 2002-07-16 5:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: luke.kendall; +Cc: cygwin Hello luke, Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 10:36:32 AM, you wrote: lkccca> I was just wondering how the work on setup is progressing? lkccca> Specifically, I'm wondering about the ease of use when trying to lkccca> install everything. A lot of the recent work seems to have lkccca> concentrated on other issues. It's easy as a pie! :) Just click next to the category 'All' until the text becomes 'Install'. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Setup.exe: plans and progress? 2002-07-16 5:27 ` Pavel Tsekov @ 2002-07-18 3:08 ` luke.kendall 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: luke.kendall @ 2002-07-18 3:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On 16 Jul, Pavel Tsekov replied to: > lkccca> I was just wondering how the work on setup is progressing? > lkccca> Specifically, I'm wondering about the ease of use when trying to > lkccca> install everything. A lot of the recent work seems to have > lkccca> concentrated on other issues. > > It's easy as a pie! :) Just click next to the category 'All' until the > text becomes 'Install'. Thanks, Pavel, it worked quite well. The user interface is a little strange - it's not obvious that some pieces of the display (like the word Default, etc.) are in fact active controls. Anyway, it was pretty easy to install everything - just a few mouse clicks when everything behaved. Some odd things, though. setup.exe became exceptionally sluggish when it got to the package selection screen. This was true under Win98 at home, and even more true on a Win2K machine at work. The delay between clicking on the package install type (Default, Uninstall, Reinstall, Install), on my Win98 machine, was between 5 and 20 seconds. On one Win2K machine at work (dual Pentium Xeon II 450MHz), the delays were mostly around a minute or two! (Watching in the task manager, Setup.exe spent a lot of time in the state "Not responding". I don't know how significant that is, though. It was showing "Not responding", for example ,during the last few minutes of the TeX post-install process - even while that window was showing lots of activity.) Also strange on that Win2K system was the fact that for the first 10 minutes of trying to select "Install" as the option for all packages, the choices would only cycle between Default and Uninstall. In the end we turned off the McAfee virus scanner, and just kept clicking, and gradually things improved until the delay between a click and the option changing dropped to about 5 or 10 seconds, then it allowed us to select Reinstall, then click again to get Default and then finally Install, and at that point everything started behaving properly. Another Win2K machine (a Pentium Pro 200MHz) behaved much better; I left the setup screen mostly blank when it was working out the list of packages, and came back 5 mins later to find that the categories were all on display; and the delay between a click and something happening was only a few seconds. We also installed it on a WinXP machine. That seemed to work fine. Response to clicks on the install type were close to immediate. Anyway, knowing that a full install can be done in just a few clicks, is great. Thanks to all those who responded - just thought I'd better give some feedback. Cheers, luke -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: Setup.exe: plans and progress? 2002-07-16 4:42 Setup.exe: plans and progress? luke.kendall 2002-07-16 5:27 ` Pavel Tsekov @ 2002-07-16 5:43 ` Robert Collins 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Robert Collins @ 2002-07-16 5:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: luke.kendall, cygwin > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com > [mailto:cygwin-owner@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of > luke.kendall@cisra.canon.com.au > Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2002 6:37 PM > A key issue is the length of time it would take to click through each > option (skip/keep/ver-w.x.y-z/ver-w'.x'.y'-z'/...) of every > package, to > install the "right" version (the one with the largest version > number?), > for every new PC. (The rest of the install and configuration is far > more automted.) Pavel has already address'd this issue. Also in the plans are more command line options, so you can script the full install. This will happen at some indeterminate time unless one of the following occurs: *) Someone contributes a patch. *) Someone funds that specific development. (Contact me off list if you wish to pursue this). > Is this just a function of the way I've installed Cygwin on the local > server? Is there some way when setting that up, so that the 1st > install from that local machine to fresh new machines on the LAN take > its configuration (install everything) as the default? No. Could there be? Yes, see my point above. > As I understand it, subsequent updates to a PC after the initial > installation are easy. They'll just update whatever was installed, > by default. Our trouble is that the *first* install seems very > click-intensive - it's not very automatic. It's only click intensive if you want precise control. Otherwise it's about 6 clicks start to finish. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-07-18 5:11 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2002-07-16 4:42 Setup.exe: plans and progress? luke.kendall 2002-07-16 5:27 ` Pavel Tsekov 2002-07-18 3:08 ` luke.kendall 2002-07-16 5:43 ` Robert Collins
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).