From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7738 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2002 19:10:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 7725 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 19:10:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.30.22.225) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2002 19:10:51 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 69DE91C102; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 14:11:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 11:12:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Quick question Message-ID: <20021209191159.GE1007@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <3DF4B002.4050709@dufair.org> <5.2.0.9.2.20021208142949.08e63328@pop3.cris.com> <3DF4B002.4050709@dufair.org> <5.2.0.9.2.20021209105145.029277f0@pop3.cris.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20021209105145.029277f0@pop3.cris.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00495.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:55:25AM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: >OK. So that probably explains the >. I probably should have noticed that. > >What about >? There's no reason to do anything like that, of course. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/