From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20684 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2003 08:45:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 20676 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2003 08:45:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (217.112.227.117) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Sep 2003 08:45:39 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h819AbZe022672 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 11:10:37 +0200 Received: (from ronald@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id h819Aakv022670 for cygwin@cygwin.com; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 11:10:36 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ronald set sender to blytkerchan@users.sourceforge.net using -f Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 08:45:00 -0000 From: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: basename(), dirname(), what happened? Message-ID: <20030901091036.GA22657@linux_rln.harvest> References: <181672454899.20030826123033@familiehaase.de> <20030829100633.GH614@emcb.co.uk> <126165476933.20030829122848@familiehaase.de> <20030829112004.GO614@emcb.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030829112004.GO614@emcb.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Disclaimer: I had nothing to do with it - I swear! X-loop: linux_rln.harvest X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:20:04PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > Where I was working at the time, they we're afraid of "free software". Some > people, eh? Actually, that kind of fear is probably more common that you thingk: where I work, people are afraid of free software too, for two reasons: licensing ("Am I obliged to liberate my software because I use grep in one of the setup scripts?") and quality assurance ("At least there's a big company behind it that has the (legal) responsability for the quality of the program..") The fact that the quality of FSF software such as gcc is often a lot better than the Microsoft-equivalent (MSVC) doesn't seem to bother them much.. rlc -- One man's constant is another man's variable. -- A.J. Perlis -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/