public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* read(): varblk tape records...
@ 2004-03-01 13:32 Jason Winter
  2004-03-01 14:49 ` Corinna Vinschen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jason Winter @ 2004-03-01 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

The NT API 'ReadFile' for reading variable block tape records indicates the 
block length by returning only one full-block at a time (per read call) 
which isn't being honored by CygWin's read() function.

Can CygWin be changed to detect a *tape* read() call and not continue to 
fill the user-buffer after the first ReadFile call returns?

The Tape Block Length information is in MSDN, within the document Q161338 in 
the knowledge base.

It *may* also be the case that setting a SCSI tape (/dev/st0) to 
variable-block mode is required before each write operation under NT/2000 - 
which is slightly different to the way my RetHat Linux 8.0 works, which 
keeps the mode set even after a write call.  Then again it could be my 
setup: Adaptec 1520B SCSI Adaptor w/ 4mm DDS-2 DAT Drive.

_________________________________________________________________
You could be a genius! Find out by taking the IQ Test 2003. $5.50 (incl 
GST).  Click here  http://sites.ninemsn.com.au/minisite/testaustralia/


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: read(): varblk tape records...
  2004-03-01 13:32 read(): varblk tape records Jason Winter
@ 2004-03-01 14:49 ` Corinna Vinschen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Corinna Vinschen @ 2004-03-01 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

On Mar  1 13:32, Jason Winter wrote:
> The NT API 'ReadFile' for reading variable block tape records indicates the 
> block length by returning only one full-block at a time (per read call) 
> which isn't being honored by CygWin's read() function.

???

> Can CygWin be changed to detect a *tape* read() call and not continue to 
> fill the user-buffer after the first ReadFile call returns?

I don't understand what you mean, sorry.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-01 14:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-01 13:32 read(): varblk tape records Jason Winter
2004-03-01 14:49 ` Corinna Vinschen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).