From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7471 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2005 16:26:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 6817 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2005 16:26:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 28 Apr 2005 16:26:23 -0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 2B37613C1C8; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:26:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:55:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [htdocs PATCH] Ping Igor! [was RE: Rebase All command.....] Message-ID: <20050428162623.GE15458@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20050428033947.GD32594@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg01257.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 05:10:48PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >----Original Message---- >>From: Christopher Faylor >>Sent: 28 April 2005 04:40 > >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 08:36:07PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >>> On 4/27/05, Dave Korn wrote: >>>>>> It occurs to me that a lot of people don't know how to PCYM* if it >>>>>> doesn't already support such functionality, so I suddenly thought we >>>>>> should add another couple of lines to the OLOCA entry mentioning >>>>>> quotefix. Igor? >>>> >>>> Good point. It would be better as a FAQ entry, perhaps. >>> >>> I'm afraid I have a similar philosophy about the FAQ; that's really not a >>> question specific to Cygwin. >> >>So, just to close the loop, the place where this should probably go is >>to the overseers list with a suggested change for the sourceware >>mailing list FAQ at http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq . > >Well, I'm not going to suggest it there myself, because PCYM.... is an >entirely cygwin-list-specific thing. (I've noticed we have very >different etiquette here from the remaining sourceware lists, all of >which are much keener on quoting people's email addresses and indeed on >Cc'ing everyone in the thread personally rather than keeping it to the >lists and PCYMing.) That's just bad manners and laziness, however. Every so often the mailing list software bounces a message because people have included everyone in a gcc thread plus the gcc mailing list itself in their replies and they trip an "excess number of senders" spam rule. Also, you will occasionally see "Don't cc me" in any of the other active lists. I actually complained about quoting email once in the gdb list, myself. In any event, I wouldn't have suggested it if I didn't think that it would receive some consideration in the overseers list. It has come up there before, IIRC. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/