From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-return-114053-listarch-cygwin=sourceware.org@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 21397 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2005 14:50:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Received: (qmail 21388 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Oct 2005 14:50:17 -0000
Received: from c-24-61-23-223.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (HELO cgf.cx) (24.61.23.223)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:50:17 +0000
Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) 	id 3544F13C101; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:50:16 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:50:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: mlockall() and cygwin
Message-ID: <20051013145016.GB6653@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20051013113609.GF2908@calimero.vinschen.de> <20051013121056.6804.qmail@web25607.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <20051013123327.GH2908@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20051013123327.GH2908@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00378.txt.bz2

On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:33:27PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Oct 13 14:10, Mohamed Amjed Ben Salah wrote:
>> --- Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com> a
>
>http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR
>
>> > mlockall will probably never be implemented since
>> > there's no support
>> > for it on user mode level in Win32.  There's support
>> > for something like
>> > mlock/munlock, but only on NT and it's also not
>> > implemented in Cygwin.
>> > 
>> > Try building and running without calling mlockall.
>> 
>> Ist it possible to install eposix on cygwin, and then
>> to use mlockall() ? I saw the documentation of eposix,
>> and it seems implemented, but I never used eposix.
>
>Er... how is that supposed to work?  eposix is just a library on top
>of the underlying OS.  It's an eiffel binding for POSIX routines,
>nothing else.  And apart from that, it doesn't even try to implement
>mlockall.

POSIX?

  POSIX?

    POSIX?!

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/