public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [1.7] regression wrt scp?
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:59:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090126165848.GA24868@calimero.vinschen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090126162923.GA1074@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>

On Jan 26 11:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 03:28:15PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Jan 26 02:43, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> I finally managed to duplicate this.
> >> [...]
> >> >It's already on my list to investigate.  When I saw "broken pipe" I
> >> >thought it could be something in the new pipe code.
> >> 
> >> But, if it is, I can't see it yet.
> >> 
> >> The strace snippet below seems to show that the ssh process which scp
> >> forks is expecting for the socket to become writable but that never happens.
> >> 
> >> At time 10048910 you can see 16384 bytes received.  Then select() is
> >> called to inspect the socket handler for readability/writability.  But
> >> select claims that the socket handle is never ready.
> >
> >It's probably right about that.  The peek_socket function is called in a
> >loop by the thread_socket function (via select) with a non INFINITE
> >timeout.  The "Broken pipe" message already occured at the time the
> >peek_socket function is repeated ad infinitum.  This message in the
> >strace does not mean that SSH hangs for that reason, it just doesn't get
> >any data from the remote side.  SSH maintains a select loop over all
> >open descriptors and every poll from the thread_socket function
> >generates this debug message.  SSH seems to be waiting for data from the
> >local pipe to the local scp actually.
> 
> Ok.  I was pretty sure that I hadn't seen a broken pipe message at this
> point but I could be mistaken.
> 
> Btw, in an unrelated problem, the reason that I didn't look into this
> earlier was because my normal system for debugging this problem can no
> longer connect to sourceware.org.  I am not running a firewall or any
> BLODA but it seems to hang in the initial connect and never recover.
> 1.5.25 works fine.  It is just sourceware.org which seems to have
> this problem, which is weird.

WJFFM from XP as well as from 2K8.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-26 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-07  8:19 Charles Wilson
2009-01-08 11:29 ` Corinna Vinschen
2009-01-08 16:36   ` Christopher Faylor
2009-01-08 16:41     ` Corinna Vinschen
2009-01-26 10:52     ` Christopher Faylor
2009-01-26 15:46       ` Corinna Vinschen
2009-01-26 17:17         ` Christopher Faylor
2009-01-26 18:59           ` Corinna Vinschen [this message]
2009-01-26 21:35             ` Christopher Faylor
2009-01-26 19:46           ` Corinna Vinschen
2009-01-27 19:33           ` Christopher Faylor
2009-01-28  3:01             ` Charles Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090126165848.GA24868@calimero.vinschen.de \
    --to=corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).