From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-return-154803-listarch-cygwin=sourceware.org@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 26969 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2009 18:38:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 26960 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Sep 2009 18:38:10 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from pool-98-110-183-151.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (98.110.183.151)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:38:05 +0000
Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) 	by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB3F13C0C4 	for <cygwin@cygwin.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:37:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) 	id 091D82B352; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:37:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:38:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [1.7] gvim "Cannot fork" error
Message-ID: <20090921183755.GB16647@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <h8cl9e$pd1$1@ger.gmane.org>  <a9a39a210909120714n126aed2dpb7beead460a870b0@mail.gmail.com>  <20090921022457.GA32232@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>  <4AB73096.9030407@users.sourceforge.net>  <20090921144827.GA15626@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>  <4AB7A633.6060002@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4AB7A633.6060002@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00501.txt.bz2

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 05:13:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I can say that any DLL built with cygwin-1.7.0-51 - cygwin-1.7.0-56 is
>>probably suspect.  That's 2009-07-13 - 2009-08-13 .
>
>Argh, that's my fault isn't it?  Sorry for not figuring out we should
>have done this when we first fixed that bug and thanks for putting in
>the debugging effort.

Yeah, it's your "fault".  But, of course, you introduced a new mechanism
to fix a very longstanding problem.  Some kinks are to be expected.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple