From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1117 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2010 22:27:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 1109 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Oct 2010 22:27:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:27:23 +0000 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Oct 2010 22:27:19 -0000 Received: from e179208226.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO localhost) [85.179.208.226] by mail.gmx.net (mp070) with SMTP; 07 Oct 2010 00:27:19 +0200 Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:27:00 -0000 From: Michael Ludwig To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Slowdown after update on Win32 (XP Home) Message-ID: <20101006222706.GJ3984@wladimir> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20100930231948.GA792@wladimir> <4CA52D89.4010208@cygwin.com> <20101002000810.GA6024@wladimir> <4CA924BF.3020806@cygwin.com> <20101006185911.GG3984@wladimir> <1286400650.1825.4.camel@OG3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1286400650.1825.4.camel@OG3> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00166.txt.bz2 SZABÓ Gergely schrieb am 06.10.2010 um 23:30 (+0200): > > please see this thread (test scripts included): > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-09/msg00871.html Thanks, Gabor - I saw your thread, which reinforces my belief that it is a Cygwin issue. > I can only confirm this. Process creation is much slower with 1.7.7 > than it was with 1.5.25. The "fork" script runs 300% slower on my XP > box. Another possibility would be a recent Microsoft update. Am I hallucinating when I think that 100% true Windows utilities like IPCONFIG, ROUTE and NET are also slower in launching? > But on the other hand, Marco Atzeri could not confirm this on his XP > box. I'm sure it's all about time slowing down in the vicinity of > black holes... A computational maelstrom, a processing quicksand. -- Michael Ludwig -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple