From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30249 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2011 10:16:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 30211 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Mar 2011 10:16:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.83/v0.83-20-g38e4449) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:16:29 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id C18232C0243; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:16:26 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:43:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Bug? LLVM builds fail on 1.7.8 (fenv.h) Message-ID: <20110310101626.GY12899@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20110310092613.GW12899@calimero.vinschen.de> <20110310093147.GX12899@calimero.vinschen.de> <1299751169.5844.10.camel@YAAKOV04> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1299751169.5844.10.camel@YAAKOV04> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00303.txt.bz2 On Mar 10 03:59, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 10:31 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > \Hang on, I take that back. I just realized that this is actually all > > in the GCC header files and that GCC actually uses _GLIBC prefixed > > macros, even on systems not using glibc. Oh well. > > > > Dave? Any chance we can get a new gcc 4.3.4 package with this change > > ASAP? > > >From a previous discussion with Dave, that should be a 4.5.2 built > against 1.7.8. If that's not happening really soon, though, I'll > probably spin a release for Ports instead. IIUC fenv does not rely on 4.5.x, it's just that 4.5.x needs fenv, isn't it? So, for the time being it should be sufficient to get a gcc4-g++-4.3.3-4 package with just a tweaked c++config.h. I have often replaced a file in a package by just unpacking and repacking the source and binary packages without rebuilding, but I don't know if this c++config.h change would require a rebuild... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple