From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23338 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2011 23:39:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 23225 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Mar 2011 23:39:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_PD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nm4-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (HELO nm4-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (98.139.213.129) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:39:09 +0000 Received: from [98.139.212.148] by nm4.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Mar 2011 23:39:06 -0000 Received: from [98.139.213.12] by tm5.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Mar 2011 23:39:06 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp112.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Mar 2011 23:39:06 -0000 Received: from cgf.cx (cgf@98.110.183.159 with login) by smtp112.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 16:39:06 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942C913C0D3 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:39:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id DBF8C2B35F; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:42:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:39:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Drop pdksh? Message-ID: <20110322164245.GA19616@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00661.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 05:13:02PM +0100, David Sastre wrote: >Maybe it should be considered to drop pdksh from the distro, being >mksh a mantained replacement and pdksh orphaned and upstream >unmantained. This sounds like a good idea to me. Should I make this happen? cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple