From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4070 invoked by alias); 19 May 2011 17:35:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 3965 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2011 17:35:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nm29-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (HELO nm29-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.91.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 17:35:17 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.51] by nm29.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 May 2011 17:35:16 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.56] by tm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 May 2011 17:35:16 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp207.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 May 2011 17:35:16 -0000 Received: from cgf.cx (cgf@173.48.46.160 with login) by smtp207.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 May 2011 10:35:15 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- Received: from localhost (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98EA42804C for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:35:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 17:35:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: mk_all Message-ID: <20110519173513.GA11428@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <31655700.post@talk.nabble.com> <31657287.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2 On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:09:39PM +0200, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >On 19 May 2011 19:04, kathy3826 wrote: >>because there should be such command in unix einvironment, > >it's not a standard command in any way. Some packages have scripts >named like this, but there isn't anything "standard" about it, really. Yes. Just to confirm: This is not a standard unix command. In fact, if you type "mk_all" into google, the top hits are this very thread. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple