From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8809 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2011 19:14:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 8799 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Nov 2011 19:14:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nm22.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (HELO nm22.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (66.94.237.223) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:14:33 +0000 Received: from [66.94.237.198] by nm22.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Nov 2011 19:14:32 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.125] by tm9.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Nov 2011 19:14:32 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1030.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Nov 2011 19:14:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 44001 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2011 19:14:32 -0000 X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- Received: from cgf.cx (cgf@98.110.183.46 with login) by smtp102.vzn.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Nov 2011 11:14:32 -0800 PST Received: from localhost (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id A725113C0D3 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:14:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:14:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: fork problem on latest cygwin CVS Message-ID: <20111116191431.GA7620@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4EC12860.3050507@gmail.com> <20111114153109.GA21295@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4EC13D23.8040705@gmail.com> <20111114171105.GA22991@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4EC27F70.60102@gmail.com> <20111115192202.GB18893@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111115192202.GB18893@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00268.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 02:22:02PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:04:16PM +0100, marco atzeri wrote: >>On 11/14/2011 6:11 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>> FYI, the last thing any developer wants to hear after a major code >>> change is a generic "It's broke" report with no details and no way to >>> duplicate the problem. A stack trace from a home-grown version of >>> cygwin1.dll is not a detail. It's meaningless unless the addresses are >>> decoded. >> >>Ok, >>rewinding to step 1 >> >>I simplified the test case to a short one, involving just 1 make call, >>using your snapshot > >Amazingly short. Thanks very much! I can duplicate this and will fix >it. I've made some changes and can no longer duplicate the problem from your test case. If you can confirm that the latest snapshot works for you I would appreciate it. As it turns out, this was a change I was planning on making "at some point in the future". The future, apparently, is now. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple